Blogging about Rome, Italy, Travel, Philosophy, Pasta, Wine, Chesterton, Angelology, Alcohol, Gematria, Iconography, the Rough Riders, Pseudopsychology, Film, T. S. Eliot, Homer, Mumford & Sons, Mountains, Ouroboros, Carmelites, Notre Dame Football, the Theory of Everything, and all else that is awesome
Divine unrest. I’m not sure what it means if you want a strict definition. I do not know of it, but I know it, right now. It’s that feeling of anxiety and restlessness that equals joy. It’s that call from Beyond, so close to your ear that it tickles and irritates you. It’s like the feeling in your muscles when you’ve been sedentary for too long, the strange yearning for lactic acid and soreness. It’s that boredom that produces yearning that produces possibility that produces mystical rapture. It’s when Somethingneeds to happen, but that need becomes a deep, almost romantic love for the Something. Continue reading →
I am fed up with how most academic scholars choose to write. You’ve all read something like it at some point: those pretentious articles filled with unnecessarily convoluted sentence structures and bizarre word replacements like ‘problematic’ for ‘problem’ or ‘crucialities’ for ‘important stuff.’ Some of the words they use don’t even exist.
Inspired by who would win in a knife fight between all the American Presidents, I decided to launch my own thought experiment of a similar nature, namely: who would win in a knife fight between all the major philosophers of history, both Eastern and Western.In this hypothetical duel to the death, the following factors are in play:
All philosophers are assumed to be in their prime and at their strongest, although they are of indeterminate ages. Their entire life story is taken into account. All anecdotes about the philosophers are assumed to be true.
There are no rules of combat.
The arena is a Hunger Games style prison, and no one may leave the fight until the game is over.
Everyone has a boeing knife.
Only one philosopher may win, but philosophers may make temporary alliances.
Each philosopher will be generally evaluated, and then put into one of 5 categories: (1) Finalist, (2) Survivalist,(3) Fighter, (4) Resister, and (5) Early casualty, before the final winner is decided.
There will be five rounds of battle. The final round will begin when only twenty philosophers are left standing. During the final round, new rules will be announced.
Unlike the United States Presidency, Philosophy has been going on for thousands of years, so instead of 44 contestants there are a whopping 89. Don’t be afraid of the numbers, for I guarantee you won’t get bored; philosophers are a very interesting bunch of people, and the most rewarding part of this post has been researching their lives and finding out how crazy they all are. This will be a wild knife fight.